Everything below is enforced in code, not promised in a policy document. Where something is a limitation, this page says so — the last section is a list of what Likvid does not do.
An invoice, a document or a letter leaves only after a person approves that specific item. The daily run writes the reminder, gathers the evidence, and stops. There is no send-without-asking path in the code. The same holds for anything an AI tool you connect proposes: it lands as a card and waits.
Bank data arrives over a regulated PSD2 channel through a licensed account information service provider. It cannot move money and has no payment mandate. You grant access in your own banking app and revoke it there; consent expires roughly every 90 days.
For any number on any screen you can go back to which system said it and which document it came from. A figure with no traceable origin is not displayed as fact.
Deductibility rules live in a hand-curated catalogue where each category is bound to a fixed deductible share and a fixed statutory reference. The model may only pick a catalogue entry — it cannot write a citation, so a fabricated paragraph cannot happen. Where a sub-paragraph isn't verified against the current statute, the catalogue cites only to section level.
An unmatched credit from the same partner, a payment that arrived after the draft was written, a reversal nobody linked — any contradiction stops the chain and sends the item to a person. The most expensive mistake a finance system can make is chasing someone who already paid.
The next machine run does not overwrite your decision. Decisions carry a scope — this partner, this kind of movement, from this date — and a rejected suggestion stays rejected.
Likvid is agent-native and it is still a finance product. Those two are compatible only if the boundary is explicit: the agent does the work, the engine states the fact, and you approve the decision.
When Likvid proposes something, it doesn't tell you how sure it feels. It tells you what it saw: the invoice is issued according to the tax authority · the invoicing tool still shows it open · there is no matching credit in the bank · the due date has passed. Those are facts with sources, and the band that comes out of them is computed by a fixed table, not by the model.
A number like "0.73 confidence" tells you nothing about why, and there is nothing to learn from it. So the product doesn't have one: an item is either explained, with the source visible, or it carries one question for a person — whose answer is then kept and reused.
Likvid reads the tax authority's own records — issued and received invoices, and the tax current account, refreshed daily. That gives a live position: VAT payable and deductible, upcoming obligations, and any overpayment sitting at the authority. Where the company switches on the VAT-return access, it also reads the authority's own list of the month's documents with its tax codes, and lists the differences against the books.
Privacy notice · Terms · Sub-processors — currently in Hungarian.
A trust page that only lists strengths isn't a trust page. This is the current state, and we keep it current.
The fastest way to test any of this is on your own data: connect the sources and see whether the bank balance matches your banking app to the cent.